Is this the same size NY strip as on the regular menu?

jskim9 said:advocatus said:
Step 3: Mind your own business :-pNO! I wanna know more about Step 3. Details and pictures please

That's down right rude! How dare you want details and pictures.........I just want pictures.

SmashNGrab said:nice find!

if we have a party of 3, can we do the 2 for $89 deal and the third person just order off the regular menu?

man, what kind of FWer are you?

If you have a party of three, you do the Three 2-course meal deal

Note: you need a vegeterian as a third

has anybody done this deal yet at their local Ruth Chris?

this is a very good deal

thanks for posting

I don't know what you are getting at, but if you look up Flemings, you will find a warmer ambiance, with a West Coast flare to the decor.

I enjoyed Flemings better, not to say Ruth's Chris wasnt amazing. The Walnut Creek, Ca Ruth's is in a much better environment than the San Francisco, Ca Ruth's Chris.

Flemings in Walnut Creek, Ca is great too!.

Flemings is short for Paul Fleming, who also does P.F. Changs.... get it.... PF?!

toneii said:I think Ruth's is the best Chris steak in town.

If only the one here would hurry up and open!!!

I can make steak for two for $20! People cry about gas prices, but are willing to spend $100 on dinner.....

Americans...... Keep racking up those CCS

Well, we spent $225 for two people (100 gift cert and the rest cash) on my bday for surf and turf and one cocktail each (plus much extra for a couple vegetables, don't remember if we had an appetizer). I was sorely disappointed. I wish I had done steak and lobster at home, as the results would have been far, far superior (lobster from Costco, beef from Siesel's off Morena Blvd. My wife, on the other hand, says it was OK (when defending it, she stressed that it really was just OK, and not "good"), and not worth anything like what we paid. I have broad and deep experience eating around the world, and in my experience, this was just not even worth 50 bucks. I think it was a bit better than our last trip (once every decade) to Sizzler, but I really am not sure, though I remember that steak was 30-40% fat, and the one at RC was a good piece of meat. As I recall, a dinner at Outback a couple years ago was FAR superior. Same great service, nice atmosphere, though no bay view.

I know many people love RC and others are so-so like me. I thought maybe there was something wrong with my mouth, but what I ate a couple days before was absolutely delicious, and I ate after that and thoroughly enjoyed my meal. It really bothered me for a few days that the most expensive meal I had ever paid for in my life was so disappointing. Maybe my taste buds have become pedestrian like the rest of me should with the price of gas these days.

OTOH, a $100 dinner at Manhattan in La Jolla a few weeks ago made my taste buds zing (shared with my wife the Canneloni and the Veal Oscar (Scallopini is better in my book), and the best meal I know of in San Diego is Jack and Giulio's in Old Town...Scampi Giulio is pure heaven, so I know my mouth can be very happy, and it was not at subject restaurant.

Pax,
Cogito

Kaabi said:I don't care about service too much, at least with restaurants. I just want the price to be good and the food quality to be nice.

what if they take 2 hours to serve u the meal?