posted: Aug. 9, 2008 @ 6:55p
sleepybubba said:It is NOT exacly one of the worst. You just have to know exactly what are you buying. This "toaster" has an ENTERPRISE-level file system that never needs defragmenting which alone makes it worthwhile. The area where the toaster sucks is (a) it needs a proprietary software installed on each computer that accesses it and (b) it's for M$ windowz only (and at least 90% of the world computers still run windowz)
As for the NAS in OP, if it's slower than NSLU2 - it's totally useless. I had NSLU2 with OpenSLUG and gave it up as soon as I started streaming video as it couldn't provide enough throughput.
valeadmagnet said:sundarshun said:How about this cheapie unit for $27/- + FS
Netgear Storage Central
Cheap -yes
but One of the worst - there are dozens of the on eBay. proprietary software means it's not real NAS, they claim it's SAN (it isn't that either)
Be careful - I jumped on the SC101 after reading this thread and some initial research, only to find out that it is NOT a practical for NAS. In particular, it is not possible to backup your system and then restore if it crashes. As mentioned in an earlier post, it is a SAN solution - simply for STORAGE. It is possible to format NTFS, instead of the proprietary format, but the format will not be recognized by windows if the drive is moved to say a USB enclosure for recovery.
Sleppybubba: if you are aware of a method to operate the SC101 as a true NAS, I am ALL EARS.