|
-
-
erdong77
- Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 1:12a
I think for most people the issue is the laptop generally does not come with HDMI port. In fact, lots of them do not even have DVI port. Hence, PC, aka, vga port is the only easy solution. Yes, you can buy some vga/hdmi converter/cable. But they aren't cheap and it is trouble. megamands said:I got the X1 from Sears and I use HDMI for my pc and my laptop. I thought VGA is old news like DVI was back in the day. HDMI works so well and its so clear. |
-
-
CdSlc
- Happy Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 1:13a
dhho1 said:1080p is the deal. I won't waste $ on the 720p stuff. Oh, phuuulease don't start arguing about 1080p and 720p!!! Why does every thread on a 720p HDTV invariably land up into this discussion point? I would suggest that every time a new post is made, FW should prompt..."Are you going to post about how great 1080p is compared to a 720p? If so, please click on this link and rant yourself at this thread till hell freezes over. Thanks for your understanding" |
-
-
Sternforpres
- Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 9:10a
The way I see it, there are only two real choices: Get the cheapest...720P plasma Get the best...LED My local Sears has ONE LED set...and the untrained eye can pick it out on a wall of 30 sets. |
-
-
QUICKAVE
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 9:21a
club stores = STRIPPED down models,versions,quality.. that they try to PASS OFF to their usual UNIFORMED CLUB MEMBERS.. |
-
-
speshlj
- Senior Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 9:44a
QUICKAVE said:club stores = STRIPPED down models,versions,quality.. that they try to PASS OFF to their usual UNIFORMED CLUB MEMBERS.. geezus, you have to wear a uniform to these clubs now? Having a picture ID wasn't enough? |
-
-
hakujin41
- Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 10:34a
Does anyone know how long these "newer" plasma TVs last? 3 years? 5 years? Longer? The older sets from pre-2007 would malfunction and stop working pretty early on. There were some that were only expected to last 2 years--according to the manufacturer. I was working for Panasonic back in 2004 and the engineers steered me away from these plasma tvs because of the short life spans. |
-
-
u2head8
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 10:51a
hakujin41 said:Does anyone know how long these "newer" plasma TVs last? 3 years? 5 years? Longer? The older sets from pre-2007 would malfunction and stop working pretty early on. There were some that were only expected to last 2 years--according to the manufacturer. I was working for Panasonic back in 2004 and the engineers steered me away from these plasma tvs because of the short life spans. I call this BS unless you can show a document to prove that. |
-
-
sartor
- Thrifty Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 10:53a
The technology is changing so rapidly that a deal like this is the way to go.. It should last 3-4 years or more trouble free. Then just dump/sell it, to upgrade in a few years when the newer technology in HDTVs becomes available!  |
-
-
skeleton516
- New Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 10:53a
make sure you get M8 screws for the mounting. |
-
-
jlh2600
- Senior Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 10:53a
Well I jsut saw a 720p Sony in Target today, & to my eyes 720p looked pretty good, well on that one anyways. Sometimes the cheaper brands even look better to my untrained eye. But quickave, explain what you mean exactly regarding stripped down models at big box stores- so long as model numbers are the same at two differnt stores everything shoudl be identical rigth (featrues & specs etc.)? For instance Costco & electronics stores? |
-
-
sdolen
- Addicted Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 10:57a
hakujin41 said:Does anyone know how long these "newer" plasma TVs last? 3 years? 5 years? Longer? The older sets from pre-2007 would malfunction and stop working pretty early on. There were some that were only expected to last 2 years--according to the manufacturer. I was working for Panasonic back in 2004 and the engineers steered me away from these plasma tvs because of the short life spans. Ummmm, my Panasonic plasma bought in 2004 is as good as new. I wish it would break just so I could justify a new larger one. |
-
-
ash78
- Senior Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 11:01a
sartor said:The technology is changing so rapidly that a deal like this is the way to go.. It should last 3-4 years or more trouble free. Then just dump/sell it, to upgrade in a few years when the newer technology in HDTVs becomes available!  Which fundamentally sucks for the average consumer, since CRTs would easily last 10-15 years with little obsolescence. Yeah...I know, apples and oranges compared to modern tech innovation. I just find it interesting that the average household used to fret over spending $300-$500 on a 27" or 32" CRT, but now more and more people fork out $1,000+ for rapidly changing tech, hoping it holds up for at least a few years. Sorry for the rant. Green for OP. |
-
-
speedy777
- Senior Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 11:12a
hakujin41 said:Does anyone know how long these "newer" plasma TVs last? 3 years? 5 years? Longer? The older sets from pre-2007 would malfunction and stop working pretty early on. There were some that were only expected to last 2 years--according to the manufacturer. I was working for Panasonic back in 2004 and the engineers steered me away from these plasma tvs because of the short life spans. Base on the spec,it is 100,000 hrs panel life Link. I would be happy if this plasma last around 10 years. I like new thin LED/OLED, but $3,000-$5000 is out of my reach. With the $$ save now, I would be able to get that LED/OLED around $750-$2000 the next few years. Here is more info on life plasma lifespan Link. |
-
-
TakeTheActive
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 11:27a
GatorBigB said:...In addition to the differences noted above between this set and the one at Sears/Amazon, the one at Costco has a contrast ratio of 15000:1 (the Sears/Amazon ones have a contrast ratio of 30000:1).A couple of weeks ago, when I was reading everything I could find on the TC-P42X1, I recall reading a post (most likely on the AVS Plasma Forum) that the Costco TC-P42X14 was NOT a custom version of the TC-P42X1 but of the TC-P42C1 (lower quality).
Since I don't have a Costco membership, it didn't matter to me (I was just reading thread after thread), but if you're considering this deal, I'd suggest GOOGLEing it.
UPDATE: (Found the thread...)
gdog2004 said:The X14 series sold at costco is not an X series...its a "C" series...which is the absolute bottom of the line for panasonics 2009 models. And yes the contrast is half of the X series(15000 vs 30000)...I would imagine once they get to their 1080p models it will be the "U" series not the S series. lame. I will not be buying a tv from costco...unlike in previous years they are not giving you apples to apples quality with the "warehouse" models. these are actually scaled down models with a worse picture. It would be one thing to eliminate the SD port or something but when you start messing wiht the picture its no longer a "bargain" ...Costcos price is no better than what Sears sells a REAL X1 for when they have a sale.Reference: AVS: The Official Panasonic TC-P50X1 and TC-P42X1 Owner's Discussion & Information Thread
|
-
-
kahluatex
- New Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 11:34a
GatorBigB said:The in-store price of 599 for tc42px14 is confirmed. In addition to the differences noted above between this set and the one at Sears/Amazon, the one at Costco has a contrast ratio of 15000:1 (the Sears/Amazon ones have a contrast ratio of 30000:1). Thank you, OP. This looks like a decent deal. As there was some discussion above about the differences between the TC-42PX1 and the TC-42PX14, I should would mention that you can get the TC-42PX1 (with higher contrast, different inputs) delivered for under $650 through a couple of places. For example, Pricegrabber shows it at $669 via Buydig, which offers free shipping and an additional 3% FW Cashback (-$20), bringing the total just under $650. I purchased mine through TigerDirect.com where its $749.99 price was reduced by $112 through a 15% CashBack offer from Bing. However, the official Bing link for 15% back appears to be dead, and the work-around method I followed, also appears to now be unavailable. The $650 price for the TC-P42X1 probably isn't so "hot" that it deserves its own thread, in part, because I suspect others will find a way to package it for under $600 at some point in the next couple of weeks. Hope I'm not crapping on the OP by offering an alternative here, but some may find it helpful to consider both models. |
-
-
kahluatex
- New Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 11:46a
hakujin41 said:Does anyone know how long these "newer" plasma TVs last? 3 years? 5 years? Longer? The older sets from pre-2007 would malfunction and stop working pretty early on. There were some that were only expected to last 2 years--according to the manufacturer. I was working for Panasonic back in 2004 and the engineers steered me away from these plasma tvs because of the short life spans. This is at odds with my personal experience and with everything I've read online. Maybe it would help if you could clarify which model numbers you're referring to. I purchased a Panasonic 42" 720p plasma back in Thanksgiving 2006, and have been thrilled with the purchase (well, except that the $1,100 "deal" I found back then doesn't seem so "hot" anymore!). In fact, I persuaded my in-laws to get the 2008 model for ~$700-800 this past fall, and as I noted in the above post, I just purchased the TC-P42X1 for $650 so I can move the 2006 model into my bedroom. I want to confirm for anyone interested that burn-in has absoslutely not been a problem on my 42" Panasonic. I have "tested" this on several occasions when I've passed out playing video games and left it on overnight with the screen frozen. I was a bit worried once last fall when an overabundance of Madden 2008 playing led to some very faint burn in that was visible when the screen was entirely black. In fact, I was a bit terrified, because I really did not want to see faint score lines on the bottom of my screen. But, GLORIOUSLY!, the set seemed to fix itself when I put on a movie afterward! By the time I finished Pirates of the Caribbean, the burn-in was gone! The only issue of any note is that my set does appear to have lost some of its brightness over time. I would guess it's about 80-85% (not 85-95%) as bright as it was originally. But I've tortured this set for 30-60 (not 300-600) hours every week, and it's to be expected. Oddly, even though I can adjust the brightness up to compensate for this, I just haven't, because it's not an issue. In fact, my uncle (he of the ginormous 50" lcd) came over about a month ago, and after seeing the tv in action for the first time, was truly impressed with the picture quality of a golf game we were watching. |
-
-
hakujin41
- Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 11:59a
Which fundamentally sucks for the average consumer, since CRTs would easily last 10-15 years with little obsolescence. Yeah...I know, apples and oranges compared to modern tech innovation. I just find it interesting that the average household used to fret over spending $300-$500 on a 27" or 32" CRT, but now more and more people fork out $1,000+ for rapidly changing tech, hoping it holds up for at least a few years.
My point exactly. I bought my Apex 20" tv back in 2001 for $99 and its still working perfectly. I really like this Panasonic 42" Plasma and think this is an awesome deal and would look great but I'm looking for the utility that I will get from it. If it is only 3-5 years of 42" Bliss, I think I will wait. Panasonic products are hit or miss. My dad bought a 32" Panasonic CRT back in 1999 and six months in had trouble with the color going to black and white every so often. But, some of their products are rock solid and last a very long time. I'm just trying to differentiate which category to put this tv into: last for the next ten years, or throw and replace in 3-5 years.
That link about Panasonic Plasmas, here, is really good. It says http://www.plasmatvbuyingguide.com/plasmatv/plasma said:]tv-lifespan.html]Plasma Displays are now about equivalent in longevity to LCDs, which typically state 60,000 hours. Consider that these figures are a great amount more than old CRTs, which regularly post life span to half brightness at 25,000 hours. Let's put these hours in perspective. The average U.S. household watches 4 to 6 hours of television per day. Staggering. Taking a mean time manufacturer stated longevity of 50,000 hours of usage, times our average 5 hours per day, calculates to over 27 years of usage. Now, there are varying degrees of phosphor ignition along the way (the same way a CRT fades). Dissipation begins the moment you turn the set on. After 1000 hours of usage a plasma monitor should measure around 96% of its original brightness, which is barely noticeable to the naked eye. At 15,000 to 20,000 hours the monitor should measure around 80% brightness, or to state is technically, 80% of the original phosphors (gases) are being ignited. That was what I needed to make my decision. In for one! Thanks for the advice and evidence to back it up!! |
-
-
kahluatex
- New Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 12:21p
hakujin41 said: That was what I needed to make my decision. In for one! Thanks for the advice and evidence to back it up!! Good to hear! |
-
-
wanttolearn
- Senior Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 12:26p
i saw it at MA costco. It's $649.99 not $599.99. |
-
-
speshlj
- Senior Member
posted: Jun. 29, 2009 @ 12:39p
I finally got the Sears 42" version set up and was just checking it out a bit. I've never owned a plasma before, only lcds. I connected SD card, looked great, but when I put on a dvd movie (tried a few), i felt like the movie opening and closing credits were a little blurry and the picture wasn't as clear as my lcd (i was viewing from 6 feet away and was basing my comparison to my previous 32" Envision LCD that was there). Any idea why this would happen or how to fix? I'm kind of annoyed by it. Overall, good picture, but I feel it is not as good as even my 32" Envision LCD from Staples. If I breakin will that help? I can't understand why there would be clarity issues on the movie, but not my sd card pictures. |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|