not sure who would know that you are the first one to get this card since it is hidden under the case , which is usually preorder - way too expensive. Not like Iphone.
updownstock said: not sure who would know that you are the first one to get this card since it is hidden under the case , which is usually preorder - way too expensive. Not like Iphone.
updownstock said: not sure who would know that you are the first one to get this card since it is hidden under the case , which is usually preorder - way too expensive. Not like Iphone.Yeah because the iphone was a real bargain when it was first released.
I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
shingletingle said: I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
You assume that everyone has a graphics card from Jan 2008 that still plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution.
shingletingle said: I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
Trolling does not take a new graphics card.
Yobz
Senior Member
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 10:10a
shingletingle said: I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
Yes, but can your graphics card play DX11 enhanced games? This thing is a freaking sweet bargain, thanks OP.
Bit-streams DTS_HD & True-HD from Blu-Ray to your receiver. only way before this was buying an Asus card that was either $130 or $200. Some may want the analogue out, but i made it a point not to buy another card until they would bitstream.
Paperbag said: shingletingle said: I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
You assume that everyone has a graphics card from Jan 2008 that still plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. I'm sure his comment was intended to waste our time reading and responding to it, and while I'm at it, here are some benefits: -DirectX 11 capable -Single-card solution that can handle high-res -What MeIsCheap above me stated, and man is that sweet to have all of those video outputs -<$300 for one of the newest/best single-card, single-GPU solutions out there -For those people that play new games with settings cranked, your minimum FPS rates during high-action won't be as low as your older cards
My last point just above is why most people will buy a new video card. I play my games with eye-candy sky high. I got my eyes used to that back in 2001, a few months after I started playing Half-Life Deathmatch and started getting used to high framerates with settings maxed. Since then, I always buy the video card that can play my PC games with an average of roughly 100FPS. I only play L4D and TF2 really nowadays when I have time, which is why my HD4890 is plenty for. I don't need this upgrade, but I can FEEL the need for those out there that play newer games than I do. I support those people in this post!!
The 5850 is rated as the 2nd fastest GPU on the market ($260) .... 1st place goes to it's big brother 5870 ($380). A full product review for AMD's Radeon HD 5850 If you can afford the ride, check out the fastest GPU on the market .... AMD's Radeon HD 5870 graphics processor Speed is not the only advantages for above cards. They run cooler, use less power (idle and max push).
bluechipwi said: The 5850 is rated as the 2nd fastest GPU on the market ($260) .... 1st place goes to it's big brother 5870 ($380). A full product review for AMD's Radeon HD 5850 If you can afford the ride, check out the fastest GPU on the market .... AMD's Radeon HD 5870 graphics processor Speed is not the only advantages for above cards. They run cooler, use less power (idle and max push).
Spot on. The only thing giving the 5850 a run for its money is the dual gpu setups at a much higher price point (and electricity point), and the 5870 goes even further.
I think the 5850 will be the top dog (at it's price point) for a few months. Rumor has it that nvidia will only compete with lower prices for right now.
VirtuaL said: wei2cool said: ATI dose not have a solid 3D stereo solution yet, hope they will put some thoughts on this.
Yes, but ATI's multimonitor "Eyefinity" solution is so much cooler, and doesn't require purchasing a special 120Hz LCD display. Wow, that's the first I heard of "Eyefinity"... sickening!! But how does that keep you from needing 120hz? I play with vsync disabled on my LCDs as they are 60hz and vsync enabled caps me at 60fps. I've been waiting for a time I can afford a 120hz (or beyond) LCD so I can re-enable vsync the way I used it for years back with my 21" CRT.
sr1nath
New Member
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 1:06p
MeIsCheap said: Bit-streams DTS_HD & True-HD from Blu-Ray to your receiver. only way before this was buying an Asus card that was either $130 or $200. Some may want the analogue out, but i made it a point not to buy another card until they would bitstream.
I don't remember seeing any audio headers on the card to feed audio in. How would HDMI bitstream HD audio?
sr1nath
New Member
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 1:07p
MeIsCheap said: Bit-streams DTS_HD & True-HD from Blu-Ray to your receiver. only way before this was buying an Asus card that was either $130 or $200. Some may want the analogue out, but i made it a point not to buy another card until they would bitstream. I don't remember seeing any audio headers on the card to feed audio in. How would HDMI bitstream HD audio?
sr1nath said: I don't remember seeing any audio headers on the card to feed audio in. How would HDMI bitstream HD audio? The video card essentially has a sound card built in. You install the drivers for teh HDMI sound, you can download them from the RealTek site, or perhaps newer Catalyst drivers have them built-in.
shingletingle
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 2:02p
VirtuaL said: sr1nath said: I don't remember seeing any audio headers on the card to feed audio in. How would HDMI bitstream HD audio? The video card essentially has a sound card built in. You install the drivers for teh HDMI sound, you can download them from the RealTek site, or perhaps newer Catalyst drivers have them built-in.
This is an inferior solution. When you bitstream audio from a PC to a receiver, you will only get 2 channel sound and lose any surround sound. The only way around this is to utilize a soundcard that has Dolby Digital or DTS encoding.
shingletingle said: This is an inferior solution. When you bitstream audio from a PC to a receiver, you will only get 2 channel sound and lose any surround sound. The only way around this is to utilize a soundcard that has Dolby Digital or DTS encoding. I can always bitstream legacy audio (DD/DTS) via S/PDIF on sound card. I am interested in bitstreaming HD audio over HDMI.
VirtuaL said: The video card essentially has a sound card built in. You install the drivers for teh HDMI sound, you can download them from the RealTek site, or perhaps newer Catalyst drivers have them built-in.
Will my existing optical out port does not work anymore?
napDaddy
Member
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 2:30p
SleekWallet said: should i replace my 275 ?
Yes, clearly you should give me your measly 275 and purchase this bad boy. Meanwhile i will enjoy the upgrade and do almost everything you are doing.
shingletingle said: VirtuaL said: sr1nath said: I don't remember seeing any audio headers on the card to feed audio in. How would HDMI bitstream HD audio? The video card essentially has a sound card built in. You install the drivers for teh HDMI sound, you can download them from the RealTek site, or perhaps newer Catalyst drivers have them built-in.
This is an inferior solution. When you bitstream audio from a PC to a receiver, you will only get 2 channel sound and lose any surround sound. The only way around this is to utilize a soundcard that has Dolby Digital or DTS encoding.
According to the specs:
# Output protected high bit rate 7.1 channel surround sound over HDMI with no additional cables required # Supports AC-3, AAC, Dolby TrueHD and DTS Master Audio formats
Utilizing a soundcard with Dolby digital or DTS encoding would be inferior as those are not true HD. Support for Dolby TrueHD or DTS Master is needed... which the card can output via HDMI. I actually like that facts as most cards, if any, before the 5 series did not have a Displayport output which takes advantage of the 7.1 HD sound.
tcrown007
Member
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 4:52p
VirtuaL said: wei2cool said: ATI dose not have a solid 3D stereo solution yet, hope they will put some thoughts on this.
Yes, but ATI's multimonitor "Eyefinity" solution is so much cooler, and doesn't require purchasing a special 120Hz LCD display.
Eyefinity doesn't have anything to do with your display refresh rate, I think you're confusing eyefinity with nvidia's 3D gaming technology which does require a 120MHz display. Eyefinity is just about using multiple monitors at the same time.
Bullhonkie
Member
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 4:56p
shingletingle said: VirtuaL said: sr1nath said: I don't remember seeing any audio headers on the card to feed audio in. How would HDMI bitstream HD audio? The video card essentially has a sound card built in. You install the drivers for teh HDMI sound, you can download them from the RealTek site, or perhaps newer Catalyst drivers have them built-in.
This is an inferior solution. When you bitstream audio from a PC to a receiver, you will only get 2 channel sound and lose any surround sound. The only way around this is to utilize a soundcard that has Dolby Digital or DTS encoding.
Dolby Digital and DTS-ES are actually the inferior solutions since their audio tracks are compressed. People seeking Blu-Ray playback from their HTPCs have been waiting for proper Dolby TrueHD/DTS-HD MA bitstreaming support without the need to purchase a specialized separate sound card.
ikonoklast
Senior Member
posted: Oct. 1, 2009 @ 4:59p
shingletingle said: VirtuaL said: sr1nath said: I don't remember seeing any audio headers on the card to feed audio in. How would HDMI bitstream HD audio? The video card essentially has a sound card built in. You install the drivers for teh HDMI sound, you can download them from the RealTek site, or perhaps newer Catalyst drivers have them built-in.
This is an inferior solution. When you bitstream audio from a PC to a receiver, you will only get 2 channel sound and lose any surround sound. The only way around this is to utilize a soundcard that has Dolby Digital or DTS encoding. It's the first video card series that bitstreams DTS-MA and Dolby TrueHD. Of course you don't need such a powerful card (and loud) for home theater but the fact that a card is finally supporting bit streaming the new HD audio formats is good news. Looking forward to the low end cards.
Why is this a hot deal? The AMD suggested retail price for the HD 5850 is $259 and Amazon selling it for $260 is suddenly a "deal". I could understand if the product was hard to find and in stock, but it's not even in stock. When did we start rating out of stock retail prices as hot?
shingletingle said: I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
Thanks for sharing that with us SprinkleTinkle. But how does your particular situation apply to anyone else who might be interested in upgrading their video cards? Does the fact that you own seven cats (while this is a guess that you own cats, I bet this is probably accurate to within +- two felines) entitle you to threadcrap on a post about a sale on dog food?
lousygolfer said: shingletingle said: I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
Thanks for sharing that with us SprinkleTinkle. But how does your particular situation apply to anyone else who might be interested in upgrading their video cards? Does the fact that you own seven cats (while this is a guess that you own cats, I bet this is probably accurate to within +- two felines) entitle you to threadcrap on a post about a sale on dog food?
calm down golfer, he is just frustrated because of his small shingle tingle ...
StudentOfGab said: Why is this a hot deal? The AMD suggested retail price for the HD 5850 is $259 and Amazon selling it for $260 is suddenly a "deal". I could understand if the product was hard to find and in stock, but it's not even in stock. When did we start rating out of stock retail prices as hot?
It's a preorder for those that want to jump on the next gen. of GPU's ASAP.
Those that do and live in CA can appreciate the fact that there is no tax and free shipping as well.
mausdmchl said: It's a preorder for those that want to jump on the next gen. of GPU's ASAP. It's nice being able to pre-order a hot tech item, but that in of itself does not make it a hot deal. If somebody posted a link to pre-order say the next iPhone on Apple.com for retail price, it would get huge red.
mausdmchl said: Those that do and live in CA can appreciate the fact that there is no tax and free shipping as well.
To me, ~$30 savings makes it a good deal. So you're saying everything you can buy off of Amazon should get huge green? If I take the 2 points you make in combination, that means I should rate anything you can pre-order at Amazon green.
mausdmchl said: No, everything that I want to buy that's on Amazon at a net low price deserves green.
I bought the card at Amazon and saved money = green from me. Alright, fair enough. The spirit of Fatwallet is to point out deals that people will be willing to pay for even if the price isn't necessarily special in of itself.
Paperbag said: shingletingle said: I have a graphics card I bought in Jan 2008 and it STILL plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution. There's no reason to buy a new graphics card.
You assume that everyone has a graphics card from Jan 2008 that still plays today's games with max settings at 1920x1200 resolution.I have a 30'' monitor with 2560x1600 resolution. Just got the 4890 Oc'ed to 945/1070 speeds and STILL cannot play Crysis at that resolution with all settings on high and full AA.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.