Edit

Forums
Hot Deals

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L for $1,207.55 w/ FS @ Amazon in: Cameras & PhotoSLRLenses & Filters

  • filter:
  • Tell A Friend
  • tweet this
  • Post to Facebook
  • Text Only
  • Search this Topic »
  • Classic
  • Go to Page :
  • 1 23
alert mods    
rated:

Linky

A good general purpose lens. Usually goes for $1300-$1400 at other stores.

Review 1
Review 2

Message edited by: viper01 on 2009-10-17 23:14:30 CDT

 

Message edited by: MarsdenFubar on 2009-11-13 09:54:17 CST

alert mods    
rated:

This is one heavy lens, not ideal to use as a walkaround.


alert mods    
rated:

exceptional quality lens. Probably the best portrait lens.


alert mods    
rated:

One of the must have lens for canon... if you want a walk around lens
the 24-105mm might be a better choice although only a f/4.0


alert mods    
rated:

this lens does NOT have image stabilization, and its older that a lot of fatwalleters. get the 24 - 105 L. portrait lenses have to be at least 90.


alert mods    
rated:

disposable said:this lens does NOT have image stabilization, and its older that a lot of fatwalleters. get the 24 - 105 L. portrait lenses have to be at least 90.

Too bad 24-105L isn't known for great bokeh. 24-70L definitely has more smooth, silky bokeh.


alert mods    
rated:

If you can't afford it, you can always get a Tamron AF 28-75mm f/2.8 or Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8.

Tamron's lens come with 6 years warranty. You pay so much for the L lens, but you only get 1 year warranty from Canon.


alert mods    
rated:

^^^^huh?


alert mods    
rated:

kyotousa said:^^^^huh?

just google Canon 24-70mm vs tamron 28-75mm

I would rather buy a Tamron 28-75mm + Canon 50mm f1.4.


alert mods    
rated:

really depends on how important f2.8 is to u. if u generally shoot out doors and not too much low light, 24-105 is pretty good with f4. but with in doors and low light f2.8 will make life much easier.


alert mods    
rated:

It is usually cheaper than 1200 when we have Canon summer rebates.


alert mods    
rated:

king0fSpades said:It is usually cheaper than 1200 when we have Canon summer rebates.

The Canon summer rebate is nice but I can't wait until next summer to get it. This lens was $1200 a year ago but average price has went up to $1350 since then.


alert mods    
rated:

Wow, really? I have both the 24-70 and 24-105 and have found the 24-105 to be at least as good in terms of final product (whether print, web, or other output). And as mentioned, the 24-105 is also much smaller, has IS, and a bit more range. Another thing that bugs me is that the 24-70's physical length and focal length is exactly reversed, plus the hood doesn't telescope with the front element, so it is made extremely large in order to effectively cover the entire focal range. 24-70 is just an awkward lens. I also have both the f/2.8L 70-200 IS and the f/4 70-200 IS. There too, I prefer the smaller, lighter, and superior performing f/4.

Of course, some just can't live without 2.8 and creamy bokeh. For those, there is a really easy decision.


alert mods    
rated:

wait for the EF 24-70mm F2.8 IS


alert mods    
rated:

garycoleman said:wait for the EF 24-70mm F2.8 IS

Any idea when is the EF 24-70mm F/2.8IS coming out?


alert mods    
rated:

I wish that would come out soon!

Here is a close one that I had that had IS on it. The only problem I ever had is that it is not weather sealed (not L and dust tends to get inside the lens if you use it outside of the studio) but it is high quality and the pictures are amazingly sharp.

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.6 IS USM
$1,046.44
http://www.Amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-Lens-Cameras/dp/B000EW8074


alert mods    
rated:

18-105 or 18-55 will be walk around lens for a DX camera IMO.

I don't see they make f2.8 for those lens, so they are much less expensive.

An extra 50mm f1.8 will fix low light issue.


alert mods    
rated:

*Sigh*

While I'm happy with Nikon gear, I will admit that Canon users get better prices on lenses. The Nikon equivalent of this lens is far more expensive.


alert mods    
rated:

Darith said:I wish that would come out soon!

Here is a close one that I had that had IS on it. The only problem I ever had is that it is not weather sealed (not L and dust tends to get inside the lens if you use it outside of the studio) but it is high quality and the pictures are amazingly sharp.

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.6 IS USM
$1,046.44
http://www.Amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-Lens-Cameras/dp/B000EW8...

I rented one of these to shoot a friend's wedding (thanks lensrentals.com!), and it is a SPECTACULAR lens. Slowly saving my pennies so I can get one of my own. it's a bit heavy to carry around all the time, but it's most definitely worth every penny. this is an L quality lens imho.


 Close

Sign Me In
Nickname: 
Password: 
Remember My Login Information:

Forget your login information?

Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!

  • Quick Reply:  Have something quick to contribute? Just reply below and you're done! hide Quick Reply
     
     
    Click here for full-featured reply.


Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2009