|
-
-
ellory
- Thrifty Member
rated:
posted: Jun. 9, 2005 @ 7:51a
Sharing Wireless Connections - A legal perspective
A legal view in layman's terms The recent arrest of a Florida man on charges of unauthorized use of a wireless network could set legal ground rules for open Wi-Fi access.
A man sitting in a Chevy Blazer in a residential neighborhood reportedly was poking around nearby wireless networks in violation of computer crime laws, according to local police.
Welcome, Google user! If this story isn't what you're searching for, try these other News.com search results for "wifi arrest":
* Year in review: Wi-Fi reaches new heights
More ... This appears to be the first arrest in which the sole offense was allegedly accessing a wireless network without prior authorization, and it's already being viewed as a probable test case. CNET News.com interviewed legal scholars to ask what rules apply to Wi-Fi (also called 802.1x) hot spots.
Is it legal to use someone's Wi-Fi connection to browse the Web if they haven't put a password on it? Nobody really knows. "It's a totally open question in the law," says Neal Katyal, a professor of criminal law at Georgetown University. "There are arguments on both sides."
That doesn't make much sense. Is there a specific law that regulates Wi-Fi access? Sort of. The primary law is the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
You can read it for yourself, but the important part (check out paragraph (a)(2)) covers anyone who "intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access." Nobody knows exactly what that means in terms of wireless connections. The law was written in 1986 to punish computer hacking--and nobody contemplated 802.1x wireless links back then.
What do prosecutors think? We asked the U.S. Justice Department on Thursday. A department representative who did not want to be quoted by name said, essentially, that it depends on the details of each case.
The representative said in an e-mail exchange: "Whether access is considered authorized can be determined in part by the precise circumstances of access, just as it would be in the physical world. The prosecutor and jury would look at how the access was accomplished and what was done with the access before definitively determining that it was unauthorized." In other words, the representative said, someone sitting in a company's parking lot at 3 a.m. for the sole purpose of network connectivity might be viewed as a lawbreaker.
Will we ever get a straight answer? Yes, but expect it to take a while. "This is a problem with the way the legal system works," says Orin Kerr, a law professor at George Washington University who has written a detailed article on unauthorized network access. "Nobody knows how an ambiguous law works until a prosecution is brought and a court decides."
Alternatively, Congress could rewrite the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to clear things up, but nobody expects this to happen anytime soon.
How about sharing? Is it legal for me to share my cable modem or DSL connection with my neighbors? In many cases the answer is no. It depends on the wording of your contract with your broadband provider. Many don't want you to share. As far back as 2002, Time Warner Cable was sending warnings to customers with open Wi-Fi access points, and a year later it sued an apartment complex on charges of illicit sharing. Also, AT&T Broadband has acknowledged monitoring customers for "inordinately high" usage.
"Our terms of service for Verizon Online DSL customers do prohibit them from sharing their connection," says Verizon spokeswoman Bobbi Henson. "The service is meant for use in one location, which would be their home."
What happens if someone does something unsavory with my Wi-Fi connection? Can I get in trouble? This is another area of ambiguity. "I don't think you would ever be held vicariously liable for unwittingly allowing someone to use your network even if they're trafficking in child pornography. You're just considered a victim in that case," says Christian Genetski, an information security lawyer at Sonnenschein, Nath and Rosenthal. "It'd be different if you set up your own open relay server and looked the other way while spammers sent billions of messages through your open relay, and you were put on notice and did nothing to stop it."
Still, one reason to tighten up your Wi-Fi security is that an open wireless connection can be used for mischief. In September, a California man pleaded guilty to spamming people through open Wi-Fi hot spots.
Are state laws about unauthorized access different? Yes, but often not in an important way. Genetski says that "as a general rule, most states model their computer crime laws after (the federal law)." |
Message edited by: ellory on 2005-08-17 07:16:19 CDT
-
-
ellory
- Thrifty Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 1, 2005 @ 5:06p
I agree with most of what you posted.
I'll post back later tonight or tomorrow with some more detailed comments and then figure out how to incorporate in the posts
I've seen you post this information as part of other threads and have mostly agreed |
-
-
RightHere
- Senior Member - 4K
rated:
posted: Jul. 3, 2005 @ 4:43a
Contribution to the FW community deleted. |
Message edited by: RightHere on 2006-11-20 23:24:14 CST
-
-
RightHere
- Senior Member - 4K
rated:
posted: Jul. 3, 2005 @ 1:57p
Contribution to the FW community deleted. |
Message edited by: RightHere on 2006-11-20 23:24:33 CST
-
-
RightHere
- Senior Member - 4K
rated:
posted: Jul. 3, 2005 @ 4:44p
Contribution to the FW community deleted. |
Message edited by: RightHere on 2006-11-20 23:24:56 CST
-
-
RightHere
- Senior Member - 4K
rated:
posted: Jul. 3, 2005 @ 6:26p
Contribution to the FW community deleted. |
Message edited by: RightHere on 2006-11-20 23:25:19 CST
-
-
RightHere
- Senior Member - 4K
rated:
posted: Jul. 3, 2005 @ 6:57p
Contribution to the FW community deleted. |
Message edited by: RightHere on 2006-11-20 23:26:03 CST
-
-
ellory
- Thrifty Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 4, 2005 @ 6:16a
RightHere and hunter777 - no need for apologies.
A valuable and respectful discussion. And having it in this thread will help others find it
I've made the following changes in this thread
1. Changed the configuration post to included WPA2 and directly linked it the secuirty post. Included a note that indicates that only WPA2 should be considered secure
2. Updated the security post with the same caution about WEP and WPA.
3. Linked the security post to the this discussion |
-
-
zmaster
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Jul. 5, 2005 @ 2:56p
I got few problems. I can't get any signal from my router, here is my setup:
I have SBC dsl, Netgear 614 G router, & 2 AirLink 101 G pci cards in two room. Each of these desktops approximately 75 feet from the router. Room1 is seperated by brick wall & Room2 is not.
Only one time in Room1 I got some signal for about 5 minutes then it died. Totally no signal in both room. It is difficult to wire the two rooms.
How can I get the signal? Is my router or wirless pci card could be bad? Will a signal booster be help? Please help, someone who had similar problem. |
-
-
ellory
- Thrifty Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 5, 2005 @ 11:15p
1. Bring your gear into the same room. If you can get your devices to connect, then you hardware works 2. See this post for your alternatives, if you have good hardware 3. Please post back in a new thread (to better make your problem searchable by others and to avoid cluttering up this one). When you do, please include the details requested in sticky #1
Good luck! |
-
-
StarPilot
- Senior Member - 9K
rated:
posted: Jul. 21, 2005 @ 3:30p
Bump,why isn't this staying on top,It was very helpful when I had a 169 IP problem. Thanks ellory. |
-
-
sue117
- New Member
rated:
posted: Aug. 7, 2005 @ 8:45a
I have verizon with a westell 2200 and a linksys router wrt54g trying to setup a wireless network between pc (wired) and 2 wireless laptops, all can see the router and each other but cannot access webpages through internet explorer, everything was setup according to instructions any help would be appreciated thanks |
-
-
sue117
- New Member
rated:
posted: Aug. 7, 2005 @ 8:45a
I have verizon with a westell 2200 and a linksys router wrt54g trying to setup a wireless network between pc (wired) and 2 wireless laptops, all can see the router and each other but cannot access webpages through internet explorer, everything was setup according to instructions any help would be appreciated thanks |
-
-
kahoots
- Greedy Member
rated:
posted: Aug. 18, 2005 @ 1:07p
Have a dilemma...got a 6000 square feet house and i want at least 75% wireless signal everywhere in the house. There are 2 floors and i have wood walls. I was thinking about buying the pre-n router from belkin however i called them and asked if i can have an access point to extend the signal however they said no because the pre-n isnt compatible with any access point and the only way i can extend the signal is to have 2 pre-n routers, however they have to be connected by a wire!!!! please let me know what i can do to set up my wireless network. Thanks. |
-
-
ellory
- Thrifty Member
rated:
posted: Aug. 18, 2005 @ 4:15p
kahoots - please go to the first post in this thread and look for the link that says My wireless nework doesn't reach far enough
See if that helps. You might also want to follow the Basic Education links to some of the vendor network configuration wizards, but there may not be much information there, as you are pursuing a solution that pushes the technology
When you post back, it would be best if you create a new thread in this (Computer) forum, as the way this forum tends to operate is that threads like this are primarily used for reference and do not tend to be monitored for posting activity.
So, you'll get the fastest "service" by creating your own thread. (We tend to operate a little bit differently, and a lot politer than other FW forums)
Hope this helps |
-
-
mrbthree
- New Member
rated:
posted: Aug. 30, 2005 @ 12:36p
Hi, when I go to 192.168.1.1, it will not recognize my user ID and password. Any thoughts? Thanks, mrbthree |
-
-
kahoots
- Greedy Member
rated:
posted: Aug. 30, 2005 @ 3:19p
Is this the first time logging into your router? if it is read your handbook. It tells you the user name and password.
mrbthree said:Hi, when I go to 192.168.1.1, it will not recognize my user ID and password. Any thoughts? Thanks, mrbthree |
-
-
ellory
- Thrifty Member
rated:
posted: Sep. 4, 2005 @ 11:07a
mrbthree said:Hi, when I go to 192.168.1.1, it will not recognize my user ID and password. Any thoughts? Thanks, mrbthreeAssuming that you are bringing up the webpage for your router
1. Try other user ID /password combinations you might have used. Note that many routers allow you to change the password but not the user id, so try the default user ID 2. Make sure that cap lock/num lock are set to your standard usage 3. If they are, try changing them, and re-enter your security info 4. Try the default security information, per the documentation 5. If all else fails, do a hard reset on the router and use the default security informatio |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|