posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 2:16a 
-
- MISURICK
- Senior Member - 6K
-
- Quick Summary
- view history
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 2:16a
-
- kloakndaggers
- Senior Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 2:24a
gave some green even though my skinny wallet can't afford that =/ stupid 50 ' panny =/ |
- 1
-
- Vanilla10
- Senior Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 2:42a
-
- GeorgiaBulldawg
- Senior Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 2:57a
$911.03 for a watch? |
-
- kloakndaggers
- Senior Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 3:07a
sometimes these things are nice add on to professions on where it actually helps looking your best such as IB. not for everyone that thinks watches are just used for time.~ GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? |
-
- MISURICK
- Senior Member - 6K
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 3:18a
GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? WHY? did you red the post - ? - all you can think of for you! |
-
- xyyz
- Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 3:19a
GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? there's no way in hell i'd pay this much for a quartz watch. but there are watches out there that run into the millions. they're more or less art pieces that you don't normally wear on your wrist. anyways, here's a MUCH better Oris w/ automatic movement and true complications. it also looks a hell of a lot better than that lousy overrated tag. |
-
- MISURICK
- Senior Member - 6K
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 3:22a
xyyz said:GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? Same here - but it's a nice TAG |
-
- GeorgiaBulldawg
- Senior Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 3:25a
MISURICK said:GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? Because this is not a Hot Deal. |
-
- LongDongSilver
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 3:40a
xyyz said:GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? Exactly. Whoever spends almost $1k on a quartz Tag watch should have his head examined. That's near entry level Omega territory. Guess which brand has more prestige? |
-
- LongDongSilver
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 4:06a
GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? Tiger Woods and other celebs aren't doing Tag endorsement for free. |
-
- xyyz
- Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 4:13a
LongDongSilver said: |
-
- chrisngrod
- Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 4:45a
Tags are nice watches. I have had a Omega Seamaster midsize automatic and currently own a Rolex GMT Master. I purchased a Tag Aquaracer for my wife this Christmas (Linkify). Most watches you'll find discounted if not purchased through an official vendor. I guess she should have her 22 yo head examined along with my 25 yo head. We make our money so we buy nice things for ourselves and our two children. To be fair the Rolex was a hand me down. |
-
- quickNdirty
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 6:51a
xyyz said:GeorgiaBulldawg said:$911.03 for a watch? That's obviously a matter of opinion, because I think that is absolutely fugly, unless you're looking for more of a "fem" look in your watches. As far as Tags being "overrated", all of mine (I have three- one Link, one S/el, and one 2000 series) have been excellent watches, and still look like new even though the oldest one is almost 10 years old. |
-
- UAIron
- Senior Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 7:32a
I have a rolex submariner - it was a graduation gift. Nothing really says "I'm a badass" more than having nearly 5k strapped to your wrist. But I digress, buy a "REPLICA" rolex. You can get them with the genuine swiss movement for under a tenth the cost of the real thing - thats the FW way. There's some pretty good counterfeits out there. |
-
- opathal
- Ancient Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 8:05a
UAIron said:I have a rolex submariner - it was a graduation gift. Nothing really says "I'm a badass" more than having nearly 5k strapped to your wrist. Nothing says I know nothing about watches more than spending 5K on a Rolex..... |
-
- opathal
- Ancient Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 8:07a
chrisngrod said:Tags are nice watches. I have had a Omega Seamaster midsize automatic and currently own a Rolex GMT Master. Tags and Rolex are for people who want other to THINK they have money. Just because you can rack up a Credit Card, doesn't mean we should be impressed. I'm not at least..... |
-
- Beernuts82
- Senior Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 8:10a
I love how all the watch threads always turn into a pissing match. Just move along if you arent interested people, Christ. |
-
- opathal
- Ancient Member
posted: Feb. 13, 2008 @ 8:13a
Rolex produces between 650,000 and 800,000 watches per year. I would say Panarei or IWC. |
Close
|
 |
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
