James, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:15-cv-02424

Archived From: Deal Discussion
  • Page :
  • 1
  • Text Only
rated:


LinkJames, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:15-cv-02424

Deadline to file: 3/21/2017
Court records show that from Jan. 1, 2014 through Mar. 22, 2016, Chase allegedly called nearly 675,000 unique cell phone numbers that were originally associated with consumer accounts, but were wrong or reassigned numbers at the time of the call.You are a member of this class if you received calls from Chase between Jan. 1, 2014 and Mar. 22, 2016 that:

  • were directed to a phone number assigned to a cellular telephone service,
  • were wrong number calls in that the subscriber or customary user of the phone number called was different from the party that Chase was trying to reach,
  • were placed using an automatic telephone dialing system, and
  • were directed to a phone number associated with a Chase deposit account according to Chases records.

$45 $75 (estimated)

Member Summary
Staff Summary
Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

Wow! $45 because you received a phone call? What kind of cell phone service cost that?



Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.

Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2017