Dorado v. Bank of America, N.A.

Archived From: Deal Discussion
  • Page :
  • 1
  • Text Only
rated:
LINK

IF YOU PREPAID AN FHA-INSURED LOAN WITH BANK OF AMERICA ON A DAY OTHER THAN THE FIRST OF THE MONTH, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED, AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTThe Dorado v. Bank of America, N.A. Action contends that Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) breached the promissory notes underlying the class’s FHA-insured home loans when, in violation of FHA regulation 24 C.F.R. § 203.558 (which was incorporated into the promissory notes), BANA collected post-payment interest (i.e., interest for the remainder of the month during which the loan was paid off) without providing an FHA-approved payoff disclosure to borrowers who made a pre-payment inquiry, request for payoff figures, or tender of prepayment. The FHA-insured loans at issue were (i) entered into between June 1, 1996 and January 20, 2015, (ii) prepaid within the statutes of limitations applicable to the loans as shown by Exhibit A, and (iii) owned by BANA or for which BANA otherwise held legal title. BANA denies that it is liable for any of the claims asserted in the lawsuit. 

Member Summary
Staff Summary
Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

bastards!



Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.

Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2017